CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE
CG1G.DE (Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - CG1G.DE tracks the DAX Index while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CG1G.DE returned 9.93%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CG1G.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CG1G.DE achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 21.48% return.
CG1G.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG1G.DE Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) | 4.76% | 22.68% | 18.23% | 19.47% | -12.77% | 15.19% | 3.12% | 24.73% | -18.14% | -0.19% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 21.48% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CG1G.DE and AMED.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CG1G.DE and AMED.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CG1G.DE
AMED.DE
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CG1G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.39 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 3.03 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 11.69 | -9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CG1G.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG1G.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CG1G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.41% | -38.35% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -10.56% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.88% | -14.07% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.68% | -24.06% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.19% | -5.59% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.75% | +1.23% |
Volatility
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ETF DAX UCITS ETF DR (Acc) (CG1G.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that CG1G.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CG1G.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 3.37% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 12.92% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 15.17% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 15.88% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 17.35% | +0.69% |
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CG1G.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CG1G.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CG1G.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CG1G.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CG1G.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CG1G.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
CG1G.DE tracks DAX Index, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CG1G.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for CG1G.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer