PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CG vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CG vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CG achieves a -21.53% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 8.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CG has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 16.61%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.61% annualized return.


CG

1D
2.69%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
-21.53%
6M
-20.51%
1Y
-1.61%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
16.61%

^GSPC

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.85%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CG vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CG
The Carlyle Group Inc.
-21.53%20.20%28.05%42.55%-43.78%78.46%1.62%116.75%-27.28%59.83%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CG and ^GSPC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2012

0.57

The correlation between CG and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CG vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CG
CG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CG vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CG^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.34

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

2.53

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

11.37

-11.45

CG vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CG Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CG and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CG vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CG drawdown since its inception was -62.69%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CG and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CG^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.69%

-56.78%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.83%

-9.10%

-28.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.53%

-18.90%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.75%

-25.43%

-31.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.75%

-33.92%

-22.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.67%

-2.34%

-30.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.75%

-10.72%

-11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.76%

2.02%

+17.74%

Volatility

CG vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) has a higher volatility of 10.06% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.43%. This indicates that CG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CG^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.06%

4.43%

+5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.69%

9.70%

+17.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.18%

12.38%

+23.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.78%

16.97%

+22.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.38%

18.09%

+19.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CG and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CG has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CG dropped -62.69% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CG and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer