PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFVLX vs. SWLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Value Fund (CFVLX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFVLX achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than SWLVX's 16.67% return.


CFVLX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.73%
YTD
12.18%
6M
11.52%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.33%

SWLVX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.44%
YTD
16.67%
6M
15.95%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFVLX
Commerce Value Fund
12.18%12.08%11.28%3.22%-2.93%24.74%0.85%24.03%-3.22%-0.32%
SWLVX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund
16.67%15.87%14.36%11.45%-7.61%25.15%2.64%26.49%-8.39%0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CFVLX and SWLVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.95

The correlation between CFVLX and SWLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFVLX vs. SWLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFVLX
CFVLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CFVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CFVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLVX
SWLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SWLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Value Fund (CFVLX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFVLXSWLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

4.53

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

18.90

-5.91

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the SWLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFVLX and SWLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFVLX drawdown since its inception was -58.89%, which is greater than SWLVX's maximum drawdown of -38.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFVLX and SWLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFVLXSWLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.89%

-38.34%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-6.82%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.55%

-15.61%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.86%

-19.05%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.05%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.28%

-4.81%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.63%

+0.19%

Volatility

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce Value Fund (CFVLX) is 3.53%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that CFVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFVLXSWLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.98%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

8.69%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

11.26%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

14.89%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

18.54%

-1.91%

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFVLX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLVX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFVLX vs. SWLVX - Dividend Comparison

CFVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, more than SWLVX's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFVLX
Commerce Value Fund
9.82%12.19%8.28%6.41%8.52%5.20%2.70%7.40%13.10%13.15%4.32%3.12%
SWLVX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund
1.73%2.02%2.75%2.56%2.29%4.86%2.00%4.35%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CFVLX and SWLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWLVX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to CFVLX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFVLX dropped -58.89% vs SWLVX's -38.34%.

SWLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFVLX and SWLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer