PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLVX vs. VRNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLVX achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than VRNIX's 9.96% return.


SWLVX

1D
0.75%
1M
2.84%
YTD
15.99%
6M
15.35%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*

VRNIX

1D
1.08%
1M
0.67%
YTD
9.96%
6M
9.31%
1Y
26.40%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
15.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWLVX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund
15.99%15.87%14.36%11.45%-7.61%25.15%2.64%26.49%-8.39%0.30%
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.96%16.94%24.44%26.49%-19.19%28.64%20.90%31.36%-4.84%-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLVX and VRNIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.87

The correlation between SWLVX and VRNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLVX vs. VRNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLVX
SWLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SWLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VRNIX
VRNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VRNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VRNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWLVXVRNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.38

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

2.96

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.60

13.30

+5.30

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the VRNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLVX and VRNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLVX drawdown since its inception was -38.34%, which is greater than VRNIX's maximum drawdown of -34.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLVX and VRNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLVXVRNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.34%

-34.57%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-8.85%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-19.40%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.05%

-25.14%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.27%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-3.89%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.97%

-0.34%

Volatility

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund (SWLVX) is 4.03%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRNIX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that SWLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLVXVRNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.78%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

9.94%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

12.57%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

17.34%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.54%

18.32%

+0.22%

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLVX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VRNIX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWLVX vs. VRNIX - Dividend Comparison

SWLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than VRNIX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWLVX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value Index Fund
1.74%2.02%2.75%2.56%2.29%4.86%2.00%4.35%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRNIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.03%0.82%1.21%1.41%1.59%2.86%1.46%1.65%2.00%1.73%1.93%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWLVX and VRNIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRNIX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to SWLVX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLVX dropped -38.34% vs VRNIX's -34.57%.

SWLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLVX and VRNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer