CFVLX vs. VTV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CFVLX (Commerce Value Fund) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CFVLX returned 10.10%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for VTV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CFVLX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

CFVLX vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Value Fund (CFVLX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFVLX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 15.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CFVLX has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.10%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.

CFVLX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 11.41%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 13.89%
• 5Y*: 9.00%
• 10Y*: 10.10%

VTV

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 15.12%
• 6M: 14.64%
• 1Y: 28.84%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFVLX vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFVLX Commerce Value Fund	11.93%	12.08%	11.28%	3.22%	-2.93%	24.74%	0.85%	24.03%	-3.22%	12.94%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	15.12%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CFVLX and VTV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.96

The correlation between CFVLX and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFVLX vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFVLX

CFVLX Risk / Return Rank: 72
CFVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CFVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CFVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CFVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CFVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 87
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFVLX vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Value Fund (CFVLX) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFVLX	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	2.79	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.97	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.50	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	4.56	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.02	17.20	-4.18

CFVLX vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFVLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFVLX and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFVLX vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFVLX drawdown since its inception was -58.89%, roughly equal to the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFVLX and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFVLX	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.89%	-59.27%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.23%	-6.35%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.55%	-14.52%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.86%	-17.04%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.70%	-36.78%	+1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	0.00%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-7.85%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.68%	+0.14%

Volatility

CFVLX vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Commerce Value Fund (CFVLX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.32%. This indicates that CFVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFVLX	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	3.32%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	7.82%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.46%	10.39%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.33%	13.88%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	16.69%	-0.06%

CFVLX vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFVLX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFVLX vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

CFVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, more than VTV's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFVLX Commerce Value Fund	9.84%	12.19%	8.28%	6.41%	8.52%	5.20%	2.70%	7.40%	13.10%	13.15%	4.32%	3.12%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.82%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFVLX and VTV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CFVLX and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CFVLX or VTV?

CFVLX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to VTV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFVLX dropped -58.89% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.