CFSTX vs. CFGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CFSTX (Commerce Short Term Government Fund) and CFGRX (Commerce Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CFSTX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Commerce, while CFGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Commerce. Over the past 10 years, CFSTX returned 1.22%/yr vs 16.48%/yr for CFGRX. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.

Performance

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFSTX achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than CFGRX's 7.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CFSTX has underperformed CFGRX with an annualized return of 1.22%, while CFGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.48% annualized return.

CFSTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: -0.12%
• 1Y: 2.69%
• 3Y*: 3.59%
• 5Y*: 0.87%
• 10Y*: 1.22%

CFGRX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 6.81%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 22.10%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 16.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFSTX Commerce Short Term Government Fund	-0.25%	5.25%	3.12%	4.28%	-6.59%	-1.19%	3.09%	3.56%	1.01%	0.84%
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund	7.92%	12.40%	31.15%	36.39%	-26.57%	26.50%	28.96%	35.60%	-1.04%	27.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CFSTX and CFGRX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996	-0.12

The correlation between CFSTX and CFGRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CFSTX vs. CFGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFSTX

CFSTX Risk / Return Rank: 25
CFSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CFSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CFSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CFSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CFSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

CFGRX

CFGRX Risk / Return Rank: 28
CFGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
CFGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
CFGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CFGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
CFGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) and Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFSTX	CFGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.67	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.32	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	1.60	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.75	5.91	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the CFGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFSTX and CFGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFSTX	CFGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.67	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.72	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.86	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.46	+0.66

Drawdowns

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFSTX drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum CFGRX drawdown of -66.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFSTX and CFGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFSTX	CFGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-66.01%	+56.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.72%	-13.88%	+12.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.72%	-21.60%	+19.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.02%	-29.51%	+20.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.02%	-31.59%	+22.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-0.31%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-21.15%	+20.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	3.76%	-3.29%

Volatility

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commerce Short Term Government Fund (CFSTX) is 0.78%, while Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that CFSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFSTX	CFGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	3.00%	-2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	10.30%	-8.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86%	13.36%	-11.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.35%	19.34%	-16.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.97%	19.22%	-17.25%

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CFSTX and CFGRX have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

Dividends

CFSTX vs. CFGRX - Dividend Comparison

CFSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than CFGRX's 18.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund	18.19%	19.63%	10.50%	4.53%	7.17%	21.20%	4.09%	5.91%	10.50%	5.74%	6.05%	11.93%
CFSTX Commerce Short Term Government Fund	2.56%	2.26%	1.62%	2.05%	1.30%	1.53%	1.99%	2.44%	1.94%	1.61%	1.69%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFSTX and CFGRX in my portfolio?

CFSTX and CFGRX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFSTX or CFGRX?

CFGRX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to CFSTX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFSTX dropped -9.02% vs CFGRX's -66.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.