CFGRX vs. SPMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO).
CFGRX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Dec 12, 1994. SPMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015.
Performance
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | -8.64% | 12.40% | 31.15% | 36.39% | -26.57% | 26.50% | 28.96% | 35.60% | -1.04% | 27.57% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -3.77% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFGRX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CFGRX has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 14.71%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.41% annualized return.
CFGRX
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- -3.77%
- 6M
- -4.53%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFGRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFGRX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
CFGRX
SPMO
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFGRX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.06 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.60 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.96 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 6.90 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFGRX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.06 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.93 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.87 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.86 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFGRX and SPMO is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
CFGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.49%, more than SPMO's 0.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | 21.49% | 19.63% | 10.50% | 4.53% | 7.17% | 21.20% | 4.09% | 5.91% | 10.50% | 5.74% | 6.05% | 11.93% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.89% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFGRX drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFGRX and SPMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFGRX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -30.95% | -35.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -12.70% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -22.74% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.59% | -30.95% | -0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | -7.31% | -3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -4.66% | -16.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 3.60% | +0.22% |
Volatility
CFGRX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) is 5.96%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.22%. This indicates that CFGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFGRX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 7.22% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 12.80% | -2.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 22.77% | -2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 19.08% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 20.09% | -0.91% |