CFNLX vs. CFGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) and Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX).
CFNLX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Feb 20, 1995. CFGRX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Dec 12, 1994.
Performance
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.86% | 6.09% | 0.70% | 4.83% | -7.39% | 0.40% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 0.80% | 4.81% |
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | -11.61% | 12.40% | 31.15% | 36.39% | -26.57% | 26.50% | 28.96% | 35.60% | -1.04% | 27.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNLX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than CFGRX's -11.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNLX has underperformed CFGRX with an annualized return of 1.79%, while CFGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.33% annualized return.
CFNLX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
CFGRX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -11.61%
- 6M
- -11.14%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFNLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CFGRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFNLX vs. CFGRX — Risk / Return Rank
CFNLX
CFGRX
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) and Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFNLX | CFGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 0.46 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 0.81 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.47 | +0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | 1.74 | +3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFNLX | CFGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 0.46 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.75 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.43 | +0.80 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNLX and CFGRX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Dividend Comparison
CFNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CFGRX's 22.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.79% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 2.43% | 1.94% | 2.65% | 2.38% | 2.31% | 2.25% | 2.19% |
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | 22.21% | 19.63% | 10.50% | 4.53% | 7.17% | 21.20% | 4.09% | 5.91% | 10.50% | 5.74% | 6.05% | 11.93% |
Drawdowns
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNLX drawdown since its inception was -12.24%, smaller than the maximum CFGRX drawdown of -66.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNLX and CFGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNLX | CFGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.24% | -66.01% | +53.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.86% | -13.88% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.24% | -29.51% | +17.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.24% | -31.59% | +19.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.95% | -13.88% | +10.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -21.26% | +19.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 3.76% | -2.79% |
Volatility
CFNLX vs. CFGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) is 0.98%, while Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that CFNLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFNLX | CFGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 4.67% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | 10.13% | -8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 19.92% | -15.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 19.32% | -16.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 19.15% | -15.81% |