CFNLX vs. CFMOX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CFNLX (Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund) and CFMOX (Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Commerce. Over the past 10 years, CFNLX returned 1.62%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for CFMOX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CFNLX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CFMOX.

Performance

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFNLX achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly higher than CFMOX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNLX has outperformed CFMOX with an annualized return of 1.62%, while CFMOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.

CFNLX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.90%
• 6M: -1.47%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 1Y: 3.37%
• 3Y*: 3.09%
• 5Y*: 0.50%
• 10Y*: 1.62%
• ALL TIME*: 3.66%

CFMOX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -1.92%
• 6M: -1.40%
• YTD: -0.62%
• 1Y: 3.33%
• 3Y*: 2.66%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: 1.46%
• ALL TIME*: 3.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund	-0.51%	6.09%	0.70%	4.83%	-7.39%	0.40%	4.68%	6.81%	0.80%	4.81%
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund	-0.62%	5.33%	0.38%	4.87%	-7.32%	0.69%	3.87%	6.12%	0.81%	4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CFNLX and CFMOX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1995	0.94

The correlation between CFNLX and CFMOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFNLX vs. CFMOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CFNLX

CFNLX Risk / Return Rank: 55
CFNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CFNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CFNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CFNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CFNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CFMOX

CFMOX Risk / Return Rank: 57
CFMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CFMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CFMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CFMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CFMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFNLX	CFMOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.71	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.41	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.40	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	1.42	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.68	4.20	-0.52

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFNLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the CFMOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFNLX and CFMOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFNLX drawdown since its inception was -12.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CFMOX drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNLX and CFMOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFNLX	CFMOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.24%	-12.14%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.89%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.65%	-5.00%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.24%	-12.14%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.24%	-12.14%	-0.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-2.39%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.56%	-1.42%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	0.97%	+0.13%

Volatility

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Volatility Comparison

Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) have volatilities of 0.88% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFNLX	CFMOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.88%	0.90%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.02%	2.06%	-0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41%	2.40%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.31%	3.49%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.36%	3.34%	+0.02%

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFNLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CFMOX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Dividend Comparison

CFNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than CFMOX's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund	2.44%	3.41%	2.16%	2.11%	1.60%	1.78%	1.84%	2.33%	2.44%	2.48%	2.46%	2.43%
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund	2.60%	3.64%	2.36%	2.08%	1.63%	2.43%	1.94%	2.65%	2.38%	2.31%	2.25%	2.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFNLX and CFMOX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, CFNLX and CFMOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CFNLX or CFMOX?

CFMOX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to CFNLX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNLX dropped -12.24% vs CFMOX's -12.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.