CFNLX vs. CFMOX
CFNLX (Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund) and CFMOX (Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Commerce. Over the past 10 years, CFNLX returned 1.85%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for CFMOX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFNLX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CFMOX.
Performance
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFNLX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than CFMOX's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CFNLX has outperformed CFMOX with an annualized return of 1.85%, while CFMOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.70% annualized return.
CFNLX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- 1.85%
CFMOX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 5.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 1.12% | 6.09% | 0.70% | 4.83% | -7.39% | 0.40% | 4.68% | 6.81% | 0.80% | 4.81% |
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 1.04% | 5.33% | 0.38% | 4.87% | -7.32% | 0.69% | 3.87% | 6.12% | 0.81% | 4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFNLX and CFMOX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 1995 | 0.94 |
The correlation between CFNLX and CFMOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFNLX vs. CFMOX — Risk / Return Rank
CFNLX
CFMOX
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFNLX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.64 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.00 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 6.62 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFNLX drawdown since its inception was -12.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CFMOX drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFNLX and CFMOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFNLX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.24% | -12.14% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -2.89% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -5.96% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.24% | -12.14% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.24% | -12.14% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -0.76% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.42% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.87% | +0.10% |
Volatility
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFNLX) is 0.59%, while Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that CFNLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFMOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFNLX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 0.63% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.82% | 1.82% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25% | 2.25% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.28% | 3.46% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 3.33% | +0.02% |
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFNLX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CFMOX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFNLX vs. CFMOX - Dividend Comparison
CFNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than CFMOX's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.61% | 3.41% | 2.16% | 2.11% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 2.44% | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.43% |
CFNLX Commerce National Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.77% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 2.43% | 1.94% | 2.65% | 2.38% | 2.31% | 2.25% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CFNLX and CFMOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CFMOX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to CFNLX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFNLX dropped -12.24% vs CFMOX's -12.14%.
CFNLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFNLX and CFMOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer