CFLGX vs. FKINX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CFLGX (ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund) and FKINX (Franklin Income Fund Class A1) are both mutual funds - CFLGX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, CFLGX returned 9.79%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for FKINX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFLGX charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FKINX.

Performance

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFLGX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than FKINX's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CFLGX has outperformed FKINX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FKINX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.

CFLGX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 9.69%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 9.77%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

FKINX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 5.58%
• 1Y: 14.78%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFLGX ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund	9.69%	4.21%	19.62%	19.36%	-10.34%	25.71%	0.32%	30.94%	-6.04%	6.69%
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	5.16%	12.24%	7.12%	8.65%	-5.29%	17.21%	3.57%	15.75%	-5.54%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CFLGX and FKINX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 1990	0.61

The correlation between CFLGX and FKINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CFLGX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFLGX

CFLGX Risk / Return Rank: 52
CFLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CFLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
CFLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CFLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CFLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

FKINX

FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFLGX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.65	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.95	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.57	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	4.19	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.28	17.03	-5.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFLGX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFLGX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.65	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.79	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.80	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.91	-0.49

Drawdowns

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFLGX drawdown since its inception was -61.49%, which is greater than FKINX's maximum drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFLGX and FKINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFLGX	FKINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.49%	-43.18%	-18.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-3.43%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.46%	-7.42%	-10.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.39%	-13.20%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.07%	-23.91%	-18.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-3.71%	-11.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	0.84%	+0.85%

Volatility

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund (CFLGX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) at 1.26%. This indicates that CFLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFLGX	FKINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	1.26%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.25%	3.81%	+3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.73%	5.43%	+4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.26%	7.91%	+6.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.45%	9.27%	+7.18%

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFLGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFLGX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

CFLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than FKINX's 5.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFLGX ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income Fund	4.03%	4.38%	3.14%	3.61%	4.15%	3.62%	4.47%	4.17%	5.20%	4.89%	5.15%	6.13%
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	5.52%	5.58%	5.59%	5.52%	5.22%	6.52%	5.22%	5.11%	5.34%	5.04%	5.19%	5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFLGX and FKINX in my portfolio?

CFLGX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFLGX or FKINX?

CFLGX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to FKINX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFLGX dropped -61.49% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.