CFIT vs. BOND

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) and BOND (PIMCO Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CFIT returned 7.80% vs 3.01% for BOND. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CFIT charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for BOND.

Performance

CFIT vs. BOND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIT achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's -0.31% return.

CFIT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 1.99%
• YTD: 3.70%
• 1Y: 7.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

BOND

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.43%
• 6M: -0.84%
• YTD: -0.31%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 0.00%
• 10Y*: 1.96%
• ALL TIME*: 2.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF	$46.87M	$49.77M	$50.25M
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	$164.06K	$239.62K	$547.04K

CFIT vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	3.70%	3.40%
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF	-0.31%	5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIT and BOND is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.56

The correlation between CFIT and BOND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFIT vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 53
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BOND

BOND Risk / Return Rank: 37
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CFIT vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFIT	BOND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	0.96	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	1.39	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.17	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.28	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.09	3.47	+2.61

CFIT vs. BOND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the BOND Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIT and BOND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFIT vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIT drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIT and BOND.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIT	BOND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-19.71%	+15.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.23%	-3.01%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.40%	-2.34%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-3.48%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.30%	1.11%	+0.19%

Volatility

CFIT vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) at 1.15%. This indicates that CFIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFIT	BOND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	1.15%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.88%	3.22%	+1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.98%	4.01%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.66%	5.80%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.66%	5.10%	+0.56%

CFIT vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIT has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFIT vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison

CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than BOND's 5.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOND PIMCO Active Bond ETF	4.81%	5.11%	5.02%	4.06%	3.44%	2.58%	2.66%	3.38%	3.18%	2.87%	2.85%	4.14%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	3.92%	3.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIT and BOND in my portfolio?

CFIT and BOND have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFIT or BOND?

CFIT has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to BOND (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIT dropped -4.23% vs BOND's -19.71%.

Which ETF is better, CFIT or BOND?

On 1-year performance, CFIT leads with 7.80% vs 3.01% for BOND. On fees, BOND is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BOND has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CFIT or BOND?

Over the 1-year period, CFIT has performed better with a 7.80% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CFIT or BOND?

BOND is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CFIT or BOND?

BOND has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 3.92% for CFIT.

What is the main difference between CFIT and BOND?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CFIT and 0.54% for BOND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.