CFIPX vs. FRDPX
CFIPX (Franklin Global Equity Fund) and FRDPX (Franklin Rising Dividends Fund) are both mutual funds - CFIPX is a Global Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FRDPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX returned 14.06%/yr vs 11.36%/yr for FRDPX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CFIPX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FRDPX.
Performance
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX has outperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 14.06%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.
CFIPX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
FRDPX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 9.68% | 23.21% | 24.28% | 23.03% | -16.36% | 24.76% | 13.34% | 30.63% | -12.16% | 23.69% |
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 5.36% | 11.96% | 10.92% | 12.10% | -10.69% | 26.62% | 16.29% | 29.83% | -5.27% | 17.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIPX and FRDPX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1991 | 0.65 |
The correlation between CFIPX and FRDPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFIPX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank
CFIPX
FRDPX
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFIPX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 1.56 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 2.26 | +1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 2.26 | +1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 8.85 | +6.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFIPX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.56 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.55 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.66 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.61 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, which is greater than FRDPX's maximum drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and FRDPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIPX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.70% | -51.57% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -7.10% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | -18.26% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -21.07% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.98% | -34.89% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.42% | -5.82% | -10.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.82% | -0.02% |
Volatility
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 2.26%. This indicates that CFIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFIPX | FRDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.26% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 7.70% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 10.16% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 15.36% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 17.18% | +0.08% |
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFIPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison
CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than FRDPX's 9.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 5.85% | 6.41% | 3.49% | 0.99% | 4.99% | 8.99% | 0.73% | 13.31% | 7.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.01% |
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 9.71% | 10.25% | 10.15% | 4.60% | 4.96% | 4.42% | 0.82% | 3.01% | 5.20% | 0.90% | 3.09% | 5.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFIPX and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFIPX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to FRDPX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIPX dropped -62.70% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.
CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFIPX and FRDPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer