PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFIPX vs. FRDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 5.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX has outperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 14.06%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.


CFIPX

1D
0.16%
1M
4.77%
YTD
9.68%
6M
10.77%
1Y
27.25%
3Y*
23.76%
5Y*
13.15%
10Y*
14.06%

FRDPX

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.26%
YTD
5.36%
6M
5.45%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFIPX
Franklin Global Equity Fund
9.68%23.21%24.28%23.03%-16.36%24.76%13.34%30.63%-12.16%23.69%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
5.36%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%26.62%16.29%29.83%-5.27%17.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIPX and FRDPX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 1991

0.65

The correlation between CFIPX and FRDPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.87 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFIPX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIPX
CFIPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CFIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFIPXFRDPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

1.56

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

2.26

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.26

+1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.75

8.85

+6.90

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIPX and FRDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFIPXFRDPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.56

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.55

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.66

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.61

-0.25

Drawdowns

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, which is greater than FRDPX's maximum drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and FRDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFIPXFRDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.70%

-51.57%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-7.10%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-18.26%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.44%

-21.07%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.98%

-34.89%

+0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-5.82%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.82%

-0.02%

Volatility

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 2.26%. This indicates that CFIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFIPXFRDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.26%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

7.70%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

10.16%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

15.36%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

17.18%

+0.08%

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFIPX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than FRDPX's 9.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFIPX
Franklin Global Equity Fund
5.85%6.41%3.49%0.99%4.99%8.99%0.73%13.31%7.86%0.77%1.52%1.01%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.71%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFIPX and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFIPX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to FRDPX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIPX dropped -62.70% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.

CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFIPX and FRDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer