CFIPX vs. FNBGX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CFIPX (Franklin Global Equity Fund) and FNBGX (Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both mutual funds - CFIPX is a Global Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FNBGX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, CFIPX returned 13.15%/yr vs -5.21%/yr for FNBGX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. CFIPX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FNBGX.

Performance

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than FNBGX's -0.19% return.

CFIPX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 9.68%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 27.25%
• 3Y*: 23.76%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 14.06%

FNBGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: -1.24%
• 1Y: 5.40%
• 3Y*: -0.62%
• 5Y*: -5.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund	9.68%	23.21%	24.28%	23.03%	-16.36%	24.76%	13.34%	30.63%	-12.16%	4.38%
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	-0.19%	5.30%	-6.18%	3.20%	-29.89%	-5.17%	17.58%	14.24%	-1.62%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIPX and FNBGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017	-0.11

The correlation between CFIPX and FNBGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CFIPX vs. FNBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIPX

CFIPX Risk / Return Rank: 70
CFIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CFIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CFIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CFIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
CFIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FNBGX

FNBGX Risk / Return Rank: 6
FNBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FNBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FNBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FNBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FNBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFIPX	FNBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.48	+1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	0.75	+2.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.09	+0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	0.68	+2.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.75	1.81	+13.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FNBGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIPX and FNBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFIPX	FNBGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	0.48	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	-0.36	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	-0.08	+0.44

Drawdowns

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, which is greater than FNBGX's maximum drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and FNBGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIPX	FNBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.70%	-46.86%	-15.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-7.28%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.20%	-17.66%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.44%	-41.54%	+17.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-37.37%	+37.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.42%	-21.64%	+5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	2.73%	-0.93%

Volatility

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) at 2.80%. This indicates that CFIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFIPX	FNBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	2.80%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	6.13%	+2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	9.05%	+2.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	14.59%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	14.21%	+3.05%

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNBGX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFIPX vs. FNBGX - Dividend Comparison

CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than FNBGX's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund	5.85%	6.41%	3.49%	0.99%	4.99%	8.99%	0.73%	13.31%	7.86%	0.77%	1.52%	1.01%
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	4.00%	3.88%	3.75%	3.20%	2.26%	2.47%	3.96%	2.63%	2.93%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIPX and FNBGX in my portfolio?

CFIPX and FNBGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFIPX or FNBGX?

CFIPX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to FNBGX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIPX dropped -62.70% vs FNBGX's -46.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.