CFIPX vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
CFIPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 28, 1991. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
CFIPX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFIPX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | -2.27% | 23.21% | 24.28% | 23.03% | -16.36% | 24.76% | 13.34% | 30.63% | -12.16% | 23.69% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 16.71% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 12.93%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
CFIPX
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
EMO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 33.42%
- 5Y*
- 32.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFIPX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFIPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFIPX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
CFIPX
EMO
CFIPX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFIPX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.67 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 1.00 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.81 | +1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 2.44 | +7.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFIPX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.67 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.21 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.22 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.11 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIPX and EMO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CFIPX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than EMO's 8.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 6.56% | 6.41% | 3.49% | 0.99% | 4.99% | 8.99% | 0.73% | 13.31% | 7.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.01% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.40% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
CFIPX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIPX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.70% | -95.06% | +32.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.82% | -18.81% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -28.59% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.98% | -93.02% | +59.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -5.90% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -32.26% | +15.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 6.23% | -3.91% |
Volatility
CFIPX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFIPX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 5.53% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 11.68% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 21.67% | -4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 26.82% | -10.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 41.42% | -24.17% |