CFIPX vs. ABNB
CFIPX (Franklin Global Equity Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while ABNB (Airbnb, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CFIPX returned 13.15%/yr vs -1.40%/yr for ABNB. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CFIPX vs. ABNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than ABNB's -1.01% return.
CFIPX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
ABNB
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- —
CFIPX vs. ABNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 9.68% | 23.21% | 24.28% | 23.03% | -16.36% | 24.76% | 2.41% |
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | -1.01% | 3.28% | -3.47% | 59.23% | -48.65% | 13.41% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIPX and ABNB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CFIPX and ABNB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFIPX vs. ABNB — Risk / Return Rank
CFIPX
ABNB
CFIPX vs. ABNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFIPX | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 0.13 | +2.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 0.37 | +3.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.05 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 0.19 | +3.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 0.42 | +15.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFIPX | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 0.13 | +2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | -0.03 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.03 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
CFIPX vs. ABNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, roughly equal to the maximum ABNB drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and ABNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIPX | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.70% | -61.96% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -21.54% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.20% | -37.16% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -60.19% | +35.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.04% | +38.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.42% | -36.13% | +19.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 9.99% | -8.19% |
Volatility
CFIPX vs. ABNB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) is 3.01%, while Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that CFIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFIPX | ABNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 8.09% | -5.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 22.55% | -13.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 29.23% | -17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 43.86% | -27.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 46.05% | -28.79% |
Dividends
CFIPX vs. ABNB - Dividend Comparison
CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, while ABNB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund | 5.85% | 6.41% | 3.49% | 0.99% | 4.99% | 8.99% | 0.73% | 13.31% | 7.86% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFIPX and ABNB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABNB has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to CFIPX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIPX dropped -62.70% vs ABNB's -61.96%.
CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFIPX and ABNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer