CFIMX vs. MUHLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Clipper Fund (CFIMX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX).
CFIMX is managed by Clipper Fund. It was launched on Feb 29, 1984. MUHLX is managed by Muhlenkamp. It was launched on Nov 1, 1988.
Performance
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIMX Clipper Fund | -3.84% | 27.39% | 19.40% | 31.59% | -18.80% | 17.76% | 9.96% | 29.66% | -12.90% | 17.69% |
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 6.53% | 17.82% | 3.38% | 13.92% | 2.89% | 28.98% | 11.96% | 14.39% | -13.29% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFIMX achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CFIMX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.
CFIMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
MUHLX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFIMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFIMX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank
CFIMX
MUHLX
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clipper Fund (CFIMX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFIMX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 1.79 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.94 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.69 | 7.09 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFIMX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.80 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.61 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.51 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIMX and MUHLX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison
CFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than MUHLX's 3.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFIMX Clipper Fund | 8.64% | 8.31% | 13.43% | 6.10% | 5.67% | 13.79% | 2.45% | 1.46% | 10.12% | 5.95% | 10.43% | 0.71% |
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund | 3.13% | 3.34% | 0.58% | 0.89% | 6.80% | 7.77% | 10.28% | 1.26% | 14.70% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 11.02% |
Drawdowns
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFIMX drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, which is greater than MUHLX's maximum drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIMX and MUHLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIMX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -62.05% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -10.23% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.80% | -18.63% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.24% | -40.85% | +3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -7.88% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -10.81% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.81% | -0.09% |
Volatility
CFIMX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Clipper Fund (CFIMX) is 4.01%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that CFIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFIMX | MUHLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 5.35% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 11.84% | -2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 16.73% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 14.73% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 17.02% | +2.61% |