CFGRX vs. MRFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX).
CFGRX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Dec 12, 1994. MRFOX is managed by Marshfield. It was launched on Dec 29, 2015.
Performance
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | -11.61% | 12.40% | 31.15% | 36.39% | -26.57% | 26.50% | 28.96% | 35.60% | -1.04% | 27.57% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | -4.08% | 10.05% | 17.10% | 17.68% | 5.06% | 17.71% | 15.19% | 36.26% | 1.89% | 25.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFGRX achieves a -11.61% return, which is significantly lower than MRFOX's -4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CFGRX has underperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 14.33%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.18% annualized return.
CFGRX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -11.61%
- 6M
- -11.14%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
MRFOX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- -4.08%
- 6M
- -4.60%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFGRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFGRX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank
CFGRX
MRFOX
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFGRX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.46 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 0.54 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 0.31 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 0.80 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFGRX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.31 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.91 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 1.07 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.05 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFGRX and MRFOX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison
CFGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.21%, more than MRFOX's 1.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | 22.21% | 19.63% | 10.50% | 4.53% | 7.17% | 21.20% | 4.09% | 5.91% | 10.50% | 5.74% | 6.05% | 11.93% |
MRFOX Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund | 1.69% | 1.62% | 4.59% | 0.46% | 0.35% | 6.78% | 2.68% | 1.39% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFGRX drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFGRX and MRFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFGRX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -29.10% | -36.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -7.09% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -12.98% | -16.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.59% | -29.10% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.88% | -6.40% | -7.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -2.37% | -18.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 2.75% | +1.01% |
Volatility
CFGRX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison
Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.74%. This indicates that CFGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFGRX | MRFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 2.74% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 7.00% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 11.79% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 12.04% | +7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 14.29% | +4.86% |