CFGRX vs. CFMOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX).
CFGRX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Dec 12, 1994. CFMOX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Feb 20, 1995.
Performance
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | -8.64% | 12.40% | 31.15% | 36.39% | -26.57% | 26.50% | 28.96% | 35.60% | -1.04% | 27.57% |
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.70% | 5.33% | 0.38% | 4.87% | -7.32% | 0.69% | 3.87% | 6.12% | 0.81% | 4.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFGRX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than CFMOX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CFGRX has outperformed CFMOX with an annualized return of 14.71%, while CFMOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.65% annualized return.
CFGRX
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
CFMOX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFGRX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CFMOX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFGRX vs. CFMOX — Risk / Return Rank
CFGRX
CFMOX
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFGRX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.91 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.23 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 4.29 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFGRX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.91 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.18 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.50 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.20 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFGRX and CFMOX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Dividend Comparison
CFGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.49%, more than CFMOX's 2.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFGRX Commerce Growth Fund | 21.49% | 19.63% | 10.50% | 4.53% | 7.17% | 21.20% | 4.09% | 5.91% | 10.50% | 5.74% | 6.05% | 11.93% |
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.62% | 3.41% | 2.16% | 2.11% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 2.44% | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFGRX drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than CFMOX's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFGRX and CFMOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFGRX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.01% | -12.14% | -53.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -4.58% | -9.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.51% | -12.14% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.59% | -12.14% | -19.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | -2.47% | -8.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -1.42% | -19.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 1.11% | +2.71% |
Volatility
CFGRX vs. CFMOX - Volatility Comparison
Commerce Growth Fund (CFGRX) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) at 1.09%. This indicates that CFGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFMOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFGRX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 1.09% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 1.48% | +9.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.16% | 4.51% | +15.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 3.42% | +15.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 3.31% | +15.87% |