CFMOX vs. CFAGX
CFMOX (Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund) and CFAGX (Commerce MidCap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CFMOX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Commerce, while CFAGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Commerce. Over the past 10 years, CFMOX returned 1.65%/yr vs 10.68%/yr for CFAGX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. CFMOX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CFAGX.
Performance
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFMOX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than CFAGX's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, CFMOX has underperformed CFAGX with an annualized return of 1.65%, while CFAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.
CFMOX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
CFAGX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.88%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 0.99% | 5.33% | 0.38% | 4.87% | -7.32% | 0.69% | 3.87% | 6.12% | 0.81% | 4.51% |
CFAGX Commerce MidCap Growth Fund | 3.91% | 1.58% | 11.77% | 17.74% | -20.31% | 19.12% | 23.78% | 34.41% | -4.55% | 23.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFMOX and CFAGX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996 | -0.06 |
The correlation between CFMOX and CFAGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFMOX vs. CFAGX — Risk / Return Rank
CFMOX
CFAGX
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) and Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFMOX | CFAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.05 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 0.25 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | 0.66 | +5.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFMOX drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, smaller than the maximum CFAGX drawdown of -61.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFMOX and CFAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFMOX | CFAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.14% | -61.05% | +48.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | -12.87% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.96% | -21.16% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.14% | -28.99% | +16.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.14% | -34.23% | +22.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -2.76% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -14.88% | +13.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 4.89% | -4.02% |
Volatility
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) is 0.63%, while Commerce MidCap Growth Fund (CFAGX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that CFMOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFMOX | CFAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 4.71% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.82% | 11.53% | -9.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25% | 14.57% | -12.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 18.46% | -15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 18.50% | -15.17% |
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFMOX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than CFAGX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFMOX vs. CFAGX - Dividend Comparison
CFMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than CFAGX's 23.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAGX Commerce MidCap Growth Fund | 23.95% | 24.89% | 10.80% | 6.77% | 2.00% | 19.35% | 4.23% | 6.59% | 10.81% | 7.05% | 5.27% | 8.83% |
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.61% | 3.41% | 2.16% | 2.11% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 2.44% | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFMOX and CFAGX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFAGX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to CFMOX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFMOX dropped -12.14% vs CFAGX's -61.05%.
CFMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFMOX and CFAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer