CFFN vs. WFC
CFFN (Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.) and WFC (Wells Fargo & Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CFFN in Banks - Regional, WFC in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, CFFN returned 1.94%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for WFC. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CFFN vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFFN achieves a 34.32% return, which is significantly higher than WFC's -6.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CFFN has underperformed WFC with an annualized return of 1.94%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.
CFFN
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 24.17%
- YTD
- 34.32%
- 1Y
- 61.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.25%
WFC
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.79%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.34M | $7.04M | $6.57M | |
| $1.25B | $1.40B | $1.35B |
CFFN vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFFN Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. | 34.32% | 21.96% | -2.92% | -21.21% | -16.35% | -2.04% | -5.26% | 15.00% | 2.79% | -13.24% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | -6.25% | 35.57% | 46.48% | 22.94% | -11.92% | 61.15% | -41.65% | 21.44% | -21.83% | 13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFFN and WFC is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1999 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CFFN and WFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CFFN:
$1.09B
WFC:
$264.55B
CFFN:
$0.86
WFC:
$7.11
CFFN:
10.29
WFC:
12.15
CFFN:
0.74
WFC:
1.05
CFFN:
2.01
WFC:
2.13
CFFN:
$424.85M
WFC:
$129.11B
CFFN:
$53.40M
WFC:
$83.28B
CFFN:
$156.08M
WFC:
$33.13B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFFN vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank
CFFN
WFC
CFFN vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFFN | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.08 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 0.42 | +4.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.88 | 0.90 | +12.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFFN vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFFN drawdown since its inception was -63.83%, smaller than the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFFN and WFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFFN | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.83% | -79.01% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -23.02% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.54% | -24.73% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.42% | -37.10% | -24.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.83% | -64.46% | +0.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | -9.36% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -15.33% | -1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 10.67% | -6.58% |
Volatility
CFFN vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) is 6.11%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that CFFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFFN | WFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.40% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 20.23% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.23% | 26.74% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.97% | 29.93% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 32.32% | -4.40% |
Dividends
CFFN vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
CFFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than WFC's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFFN Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. | 3.79% | 4.99% | 5.75% | 5.27% | 9.48% | 8.47% | 3.76% | 6.77% | 7.67% | 6.56% | 5.35% | 6.69% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.08% | 1.82% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% |
Financials
CFFN vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CFFN and WFC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WFC has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to CFFN (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFFN dropped -63.83% vs WFC's -79.01%.
CFFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CFFN and WFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer