CFFN vs. WFC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).

Performance

CFFN vs. WFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFFN vs. WFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFFN Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.	7.14%	21.96%	-2.92%	-21.21%	-16.35%	-2.04%	-5.26%	15.00%	2.79%	-13.24%
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	-14.16%	35.57%	46.48%	22.94%	-11.92%	61.15%	-41.65%	21.44%	-21.83%	13.21%

Fundamentals

EPS CFFN : $0.84 WFC : $6.60
PE Ratio CFFN : 8.48 WFC : 12.07
PEG Ratio CFFN : 0.61 WFC : 1.04
PS Ratio CFFN : 1.47 WFC : 2.27
Total Revenue (TTM) CFFN : $421.67M WFC : $113.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) CFFN : $151.79M WFC : $81.08B
EBITDA (TTM) CFFN : $69.66M WFC : $29.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFFN achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than WFC's -14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CFFN has underperformed WFC with an annualized return of 0.43%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.

CFFN

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 7.14%
• 6M: 16.49%
• 1Y: 36.01%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: -5.34%
• 10Y*: 0.43%

WFC

• 1D: 3.66%
• 1M: -2.26%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -4.05%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: 32.00%
• 5Y*: 17.69%
• 10Y*: 8.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CFFN vs. WFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFFN

CFFN Risk / Return Rank: 80
CFFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CFFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CFFN Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CFFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CFFN Martin Ratio Rank: 83

WFC

WFC Risk / Return Rank: 56
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFFN vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CFFN	WFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	0.45	+0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	0.78	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	0.66	+2.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	2.07	+5.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CFFN vs. WFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the WFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFFN and WFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFFN	WFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	0.45	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.18	0.59	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	0.25	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.33	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CFFN and WFC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CFFN vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison

CFFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than WFC's 2.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFFN Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.	5.89%	4.99%	5.75%	5.27%	9.48%	8.47%	3.76%	6.77%	7.67%	6.56%	5.35%	6.69%
WFC Wells Fargo & Company	2.20%	1.82%	2.14%	2.64%	2.66%	1.25%	4.04%	3.57%	3.56%	2.54%	2.75%	2.71%

Drawdowns

CFFN vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFFN drawdown since its inception was -63.83%, smaller than the maximum WFC drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFFN and WFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFFN	WFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.83%	-79.01%	+15.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.82%	-22.75%	+11.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.62%	-37.10%	-24.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.83%	-64.46%	+0.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.01%	-17.00%	-12.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-15.34%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.72%	7.28%	-2.56%

Volatility

CFFN vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) is 5.48%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that CFFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFFN	WFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.48%	7.89%	-2.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.36%	19.89%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.05%	29.40%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.98%	30.17%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.75%	32.16%	-4.41%

Financials

CFFN vs. WFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CFFN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 105.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 21.29B and revenue of 21.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CFFN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 105.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 6.53B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.

CFFN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 20.30M and revenue of 105.99M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.36B and revenue of 21.29B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.