CF vs. MCK
CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) and MCK (McKesson Corporation) are both stocks. CF operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while MCK operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, CF returned 17.90%/yr vs 16.64%/yr for MCK. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CF vs. MCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 42.89% return, which is significantly higher than MCK's -4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has outperformed MCK with an annualized return of 17.90%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively lower 16.64% annualized return.
CF
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- 42.89%
- 6M
- 39.56%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
MCK
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -3.47%
- 1Y
- 8.11%
- 3Y*
- 26.04%
- 5Y*
- 32.74%
- 10Y*
- 16.64%
CF vs. MCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 42.89% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 87.18% | -15.76% | 12.73% | 5.13% | 40.24% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | -4.23% | 44.54% | 23.67% | 24.13% | 51.82% | 44.23% | 27.06% | 26.72% | -28.40% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CF and MCK is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2005 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CF and MCK has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CF:
$16.91B
MCK:
$96.20B
CF:
$11.08
MCK:
$38.38
CF:
9.88
MCK:
20.43
CF:
0.16
MCK:
0.27
CF:
2.35
MCK:
0.24
CF:
2.05
MCK:
13.91
CF:
$7.41B
MCK:
$403.43B
CF:
$2.99B
MCK:
$14.55B
CF:
$2.60B
MCK:
$6.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CF vs. MCK — Risk / Return Rank
CF
MCK
CF vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CF | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.08 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.29 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 0.74 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CF vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, smaller than the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and MCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CF | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.73% | -82.84% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.87% | -27.17% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.16% | -27.17% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.36% | -27.17% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.74% | -44.23% | -16.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.11% | -21.17% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.92% | -28.64% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.29% | 10.40% | +3.89% |
Volatility
CF vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 6.47%. This indicates that CF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CF | MCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 6.47% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.49% | 22.74% | +12.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.20% | 29.14% | +13.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.23% | 24.19% | +14.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.30% | 28.82% | +11.48% |
Dividends
CF vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison
CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than MCK's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.83% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.42% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% |
Financials
CF vs. MCK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CF vs. MCK - Profitability Comparison
CF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
MCK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 96.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.2%.
CF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
MCK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported an operating income of 2.09B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
CF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
MCK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McKesson Corporation reported a net income of 1.68B and revenue of 96.30B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CF and MCK have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CF has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to MCK (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CF dropped -76.73% vs MCK's -82.84%.
CF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CF and MCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer