CEYIX vs. SWLGX
CEYIX (Calvert Equity Fund Class I) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CEYIX is actively managed, while SWLGX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEYIX returned 2.68%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for SWLGX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEYIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.
Performance
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEYIX achieves a -8.36% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's 0.57% return.
CEYIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- -9.10%
- YTD
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- -8.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.83%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEYIX Calvert Equity Fund Class I | -8.36% | 7.47% | 8.62% | 18.22% | -17.43% | 29.21% | 24.38% | 36.79% | 5.41% | -0.81% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.57% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEYIX and SWLGX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017 | 0.80 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CEYIX and SWLGX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEYIX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
CEYIX
SWLGX
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Equity Fund Class I (CEYIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEYIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.10 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.58 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 1.81 | -2.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEYIX drawdown since its inception was -50.45%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEYIX and SWLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEYIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.45% | -32.69% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -16.16% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.84% | -23.30% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.57% | -32.69% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.56% | -7.74% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -7.02% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.14% | 5.20% | +1.94% |
Volatility
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert Equity Fund Class I (CEYIX) is 5.38%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that CEYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEYIX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 6.30% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 13.57% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 17.11% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 21.75% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 22.67% | -5.50% |
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEYIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEYIX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
CEYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.08%, more than SWLGX's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEYIX Calvert Equity Fund Class I | 20.08% | 18.40% | 7.41% | 1.66% | 3.03% | 3.17% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 7.77% | 7.39% | 10.43% | 23.16% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.45% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEYIX and SWLGX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWLGX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to CEYIX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEYIX dropped -50.45% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.
SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEYIX and SWLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer