CEW vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CEW (WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEW is a Currency fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. CEW is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, CEW returned 7.46% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. CEW charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

CEW vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CEW having a 2.22% return and RBIL slightly higher at 2.32%.

CEW

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: 6.46%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEW vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund	2.22%	10.17%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CEW and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

CEW vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEW

CEW Risk / Return Rank: 37
CEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CEW Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CEW Martin Ratio Rank: 42

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEW vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEW	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	4.35	-3.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	6.69	-4.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	2.13	-0.91
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	7.82	-5.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	42.95	-36.54

CEW vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEW and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEW vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEW drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEW and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEW	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.89%	-0.52%	-27.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	-0.52%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-0.50%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.97%	-0.07%	-12.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	0.10%	+1.07%

Volatility

CEW vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that CEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEW	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	0.36%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.27%	0.85%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	0.95%	+5.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.87%	1.07%	+5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.00%	1.07%	+5.93%

CEW vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEW vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

CEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund	2.42%	2.47%	5.42%	2.00%	0.80%	0.00%	0.64%	1.90%	1.87%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEW and RBIL in my portfolio?

CEW and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEW or RBIL?

CEW has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEW dropped -27.89% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, CEW or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, CEW leads with 7.46% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEW or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, CEW has performed better with a 7.46% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEW or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEW or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.42% for CEW.

What is the main difference between CEW and RBIL?

CEW is categorized as Currency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEW and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.