CEW vs. BPH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CEW (WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEW is a Currency fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CEW charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

CEW vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CEW

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.23%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 1Y: 9.10%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 2.43%
• ALL TIME*: 1.12%

BPH

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 18.84%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	$53.46K	$52.99K	$51.54K
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund	$328.43K	$171.66K	$92.20K

CEW vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund	1.68%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CEW and BPH is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.04

Return for Risk

CEW vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEW

CEW Risk / Return Rank: 70
CEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CEW Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
CEW Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEW vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund (CEW) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEW	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	—	—

Drawdowns

CEW vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEW drawdown since its inception was -27.89%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEW and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEW	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.89%	-15.58%	-12.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.90%	-5.64%	-7.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CEW	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.40%	28.58%	-22.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.89%	28.58%	-21.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.94%	28.58%	-21.64%

CEW vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEW has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEW vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

CEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than BPH's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEW WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund	2.37%	2.47%	5.42%	2.00%	0.80%	0.00%	0.64%	1.90%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEW and BPH in my portfolio?

CEW and BPH have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CEW or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEW or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CEW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEW or BPH?

CEW has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.48% for BPH.

What is the main difference between CEW and BPH?

CEW is categorized as Currency, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CEW and 0.19% for BPH.