CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE
CEUG.DE (iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEUG.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEUG.DE returned 8.85%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEUG.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEUG.DE achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CEUG.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 8.85%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
CEUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEUG.DE iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 7.45% | 19.02% | 9.58% | 15.40% | -11.56% | 25.11% | -3.26% | 27.70% | -10.95% | 10.55% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEUG.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.56 |
The correlation between CEUG.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEUG.DE
LSMC.DE
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEUG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.59 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 10.37 | -8.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.05 | 32.83 | -26.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEUG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 4.27 | -3.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 1.15 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 1.09 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEUG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -39.77% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -12.53% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.67% | -36.22% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.04% | -39.77% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.67% | -39.77% | +4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -3.34% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -9.37% | +3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.96% | -1.20% |
Volatility
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) is 4.42%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that CEUG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEUG.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 11.23% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 22.18% | -11.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 30.40% | -16.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 31.21% | -16.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 26.06% | -10.44% |
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEUG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEUG.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEUG.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEUG.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEUG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
CEUG.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. CEUG.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEUG.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEUG.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer