PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CEUG.DE having a 7.45% return and H4ZZ.DE slightly lower at 7.20%.


CEUG.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
3.72%
YTD
7.45%
6M
10.20%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
8.85%

H4ZZ.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
4.70%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.61%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CEUG.DE
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
7.45%19.02%9.58%15.40%0.80%
H4ZZ.DE
HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.20%22.35%10.99%22.53%9.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CEUG.DE and H4ZZ.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.93

The correlation between CEUG.DE and H4ZZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEUG.DE
CEUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CEUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZZ.DE
H4ZZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEUG.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

1.43

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

4.86

+1.19

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEUG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEUG.DE and H4ZZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEUG.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.98

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.18

-0.66

Drawdowns

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.DE and H4ZZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEUG.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-16.46%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-10.94%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

-16.46%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-0.53%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-2.68%

-2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.23%

-0.47%

Volatility

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) is 4.42%, while HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that CEUG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEUG.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.93%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

12.97%

-1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

15.97%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

15.85%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

15.85%

-0.23%

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEUG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEUG.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEUG.DE nor H4ZZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CEUG.DE and H4ZZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CEUG.DE.

CEUG.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEUG.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEUG.DE and H4ZZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer