PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEUG.DE achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than ELFC.DE's 12.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEUG.DE having a 8.85% annualized return and ELFC.DE not far ahead at 8.86%.


CEUG.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
3.72%
YTD
7.45%
6M
10.20%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
8.85%

ELFC.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.92%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.29%
1Y
20.13%
3Y*
12.09%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEUG.DE
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
7.45%19.02%9.58%15.40%-11.56%25.11%-3.26%27.70%-10.95%10.55%
ELFC.DE
Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF
12.62%17.73%-0.16%15.69%1.54%21.96%-7.15%19.94%-4.03%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CEUG.DE and ELFC.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between CEUG.DE and ELFC.DE has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEUG.DE
CEUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CEUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ELFC.DE
ELFC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELFC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) and Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEUG.DEELFC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.00

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

8.42

-2.37

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEUG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ELFC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEUG.DE and ELFC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEUG.DEELFC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.81

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.73

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.56

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.55

-0.03

Drawdowns

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum ELFC.DE drawdown of -37.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEUG.DE and ELFC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEUG.DEELFC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-37.68%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-6.71%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

-15.02%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-16.85%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.67%

-37.68%

+2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.60%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-4.70%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.39%

+0.37%

Volatility

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CEUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF (ELFC.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that CEUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELFC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEUG.DEELFC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

2.62%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

8.07%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

11.12%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

13.76%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

16.40%

-0.78%

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEUG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ELFC.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEUG.DE vs. ELFC.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEUG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELFC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEUG.DE
iShares MSCI EMU UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ELFC.DE
Deka Euro iSTOXX ex Fin Dividend Plus UCITS ETF
4.08%4.45%4.66%4.66%4.91%3.85%2.83%3.64%4.20%3.53%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEUG.DE and ELFC.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEUG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ELFC.DE.

CEUG.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while ELFC.DE tracks EURO iSTOXX® ex Financials High Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEUG.DE and 0.30% for ELFC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEUG.DE and ELFC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer