CEU1.L vs. CMU.L
CEU1.L (iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEU1.L returned 11.08%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEU1.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEU1.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEU1.L having a 11.08% annualized return and CMU.L not far behind at 10.79%.
CEU1.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEU1.L iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 7.95% | 30.63% | 4.62% | 16.50% | -6.40% | 14.38% | 5.24% | 19.34% | -11.60% | 17.38% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 17.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEU1.L and CMU.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.91 |
The correlation between CEU1.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Industrials
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Technology
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Utilities
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Energy
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
CEU1.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEU1.L
CMU.L
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEU1.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.58 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 9.67 | -2.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEU1.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.98 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.49 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEU1.L drawdown since its inception was -31.47%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU1.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEU1.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -32.53% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -11.43% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | -11.95% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.68% | -21.11% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.39% | -31.41% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.18% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -5.80% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.05% | +0.05% |
Volatility
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) is 4.55%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that CEU1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEU1.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 5.34% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 12.44% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 14.86% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 16.00% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 16.78% | -0.01% |
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEU1.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEU1.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CEU1.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CEU1.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEU1.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU1.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for CEU1.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer