PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEU1.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEU1.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEU1.L having a 11.08% annualized return and CMU.L not far behind at 10.79%.


CEU1.L

1D
0.41%
1M
4.87%
YTD
7.95%
6M
9.61%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.08%

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEU1.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
7.95%30.63%4.62%16.50%-6.40%14.38%5.24%19.34%-11.60%17.38%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CEU1.L and CMU.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.91

The correlation between CEU1.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CEU1.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

24.0%
21.8%

Industrials

21.0%
15.7%

Technology

15.9%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.1%

Utilities

6.4%
5.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.0%
2.8%

Energy

3.9%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.3%

Financial Services

CEU1.L
24.0%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

CEU1.L
21.0%
CMU.L
15.7%

Technology

CEU1.L
15.9%
CMU.L
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CEU1.L
8.4%
CMU.L
10.1%

Utilities

CEU1.L
6.4%
CMU.L
5.8%

Healthcare

CEU1.L
5.6%
CMU.L
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

CEU1.L
5.6%
CMU.L
5.2%

Communication Services

CEU1.L
4.3%
CMU.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

CEU1.L
4.0%
CMU.L
2.8%

Energy

CEU1.L
3.9%
CMU.L
0.0%

Real Estate

CEU1.L
0.9%
CMU.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEU1.L
CEU1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU1.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.58

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

9.67

-2.88

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU1.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEU1.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.98

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.66

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.49

+0.02

Drawdowns

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU1.L drawdown since its inception was -31.47%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU1.L and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEU1.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.47%

-32.53%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-11.43%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-11.95%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.68%

-21.11%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

-31.41%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.18%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.80%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.05%

+0.05%

Volatility

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEU1.L) is 4.55%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that CEU1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEU1.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

5.34%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

12.44%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

14.86%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.00%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.78%

-0.01%

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEU1.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEU1.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEU1.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CEU1.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CEU1.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEU1.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for CEU1.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU1.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer