PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CEU.TO (CES Energy Solutions Corp.) is a stock, while XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) is Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 5 years, CEU.TO returned 59.51%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEU.TO achieves a 45.66% return, which is significantly higher than XEQT.TO's 12.29% return.

CEU.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
45.66%
6M
42.91%
1Y
173.58%
3Y*
96.12%
5Y*
59.51%
10Y*
19.64%

XEQT.TO

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.98%
YTD
12.29%
6M
11.20%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.		45.66%26.24%192.68%28.94%39.80%61.31%-44.70%32.60%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		12.29%19.47%24.36%17.25%-11.01%18.94%11.82%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CEU.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019

0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between CEU.TO and XEQT.TO has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CES Energy Solutions Corp.

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Often compared with CEU.TO:
CEU.TO vs. SES.TOCEU.TO vs. VBNK.TOCEU.TO vs. BDT.TOCEU.TO vs. CNLCEU.TO vs. OGD.TOCEU.TO vs. EFX.TOCEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO
Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CEU.TO
CEU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CEU.TOXEQT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.09
2.53

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.78
3.49

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.47

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.50

3.56

+11.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.20

15.50

+31.70

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.09, which is higher than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU.TO and XEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CEU.TOXEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.09

2.53

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

1.05

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.95

-0.57

Drawdowns

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.27%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU.TO and XEQT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CEU.TOXEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.27%

-29.74%

-64.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-8.25%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.77%

-15.08%

-26.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.77%

-19.56%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.84%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-0.56%

-7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-4.11%

-34.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

1.89%

+1.81%

Volatility

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 3.70%. This indicates that CEU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CEU.TOXEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

3.70%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

9.38%

+13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.67%

11.63%

+23.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.66%

13.12%

+28.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.91%

15.56%

+35.35%

Dividends

CEU.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XEQT.TO's 1.48% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.		1.03%1.40%1.21%2.75%2.46%1.58%0.86%2.58%1.59%0.55%0.67%8.40%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.48%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CEU.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU.TO and XEQT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer