PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CEU.TO having a 45.66% return and CNQ.TO slightly lower at 44.04%. Over the past 10 years, CEU.TO has outperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 19.64%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.64% annualized return.


CEU.TO

1D
0.85%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
45.66%
6M
42.91%
1Y
173.58%
3Y*
96.12%
5Y*
59.51%
10Y*
19.64%

CNQ.TO

1D
1.47%
1M
2.49%
YTD
44.04%
6M
42.39%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
30.24%
10Y*
18.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.
45.66%26.24%192.68%28.94%39.80%61.31%-44.70%-24.06%-51.19%-14.27%
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
44.04%10.42%7.11%21.06%49.65%82.41%-20.75%32.78%-24.17%7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between CEU.TO and CNQ.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2006

0.38

The correlation between CEU.TO and CNQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CEU.TO:

CA$3.79B

CNQ.TO:

CA$139.10B

EPS

CEU.TO:

CA$0.97

CNQ.TO:

CA$4.65

PE Ratio

CEU.TO:

18.44

CNQ.TO:

14.27

PEG Ratio

CEU.TO:

0.37

CNQ.TO:

0.69

PS Ratio

CEU.TO:

1.53

CNQ.TO:

3.50

PB Ratio

CEU.TO:

4.49

CNQ.TO:

3.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

CEU.TO:

CA$2.54B

CNQ.TO:

CA$39.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CEU.TO:

CA$597.19M

CNQ.TO:

CA$12.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

CEU.TO:

CA$358.87M

CNQ.TO:

CA$17.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEU.TO
CEU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CNQ.TO
CNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU.TOCNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.35

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.50

4.03

+11.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.20

10.58

+36.63

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.09, which is higher than the CNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU.TO and CNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEU.TOCNQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.09

2.16

+2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

1.00

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.49

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.63

-0.25

Drawdowns

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.27%, which is greater than CNQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU.TO and CNQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEU.TOCNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.27%

-76.20%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-15.33%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.77%

-33.11%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.77%

-33.11%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.84%

-76.20%

-16.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-4.46%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-18.90%

-19.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

5.83%

-2.13%

Volatility

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) have volatilities of 9.84% and 9.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEU.TOCNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.84%

9.61%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

23.71%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.67%

28.67%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.66%

30.46%

+11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.91%

38.03%

+12.88%

Dividends

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CNQ.TO's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.
1.03%1.40%1.21%2.75%2.46%1.58%0.86%2.58%1.59%0.55%0.67%8.40%
CNQ.TO
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.60%5.06%4.82%4.26%6.12%3.66%5.44%3.50%3.98%2.40%2.15%3.02%

Financials

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CES Energy Solutions Corp. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
681.51M
10.81B
(CEU.TO) Total Revenue
(CNQ.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

CEU.TO vs. CNQ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CES Energy Solutions Corp. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
23.1%
32.1%
Portfolio components
CEU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CES Energy Solutions Corp. reported a gross profit of 157.06M and revenue of 681.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.1%.

CNQ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 10.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.

CEU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CES Energy Solutions Corp. reported an operating income of 56.28M and revenue of 681.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

CNQ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.

CEU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CES Energy Solutions Corp. reported a net income of 50.26M and revenue of 681.51M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

CNQ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CEU.TO and CNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEU.TO and CNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer