PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CEU.TOBDT.TO
YTD Return166.78%104.80%
1Y Return146.52%142.23%
3Y Return (Ann)67.41%46.34%
5Y Return (Ann)39.46%40.72%
10Y Return (Ann)1.67%14.94%
Sharpe Ratio3.613.66
Sortino Ratio4.094.32
Omega Ratio1.531.55
Calmar Ratio2.187.05
Martin Ratio26.5821.78
Ulcer Index5.34%6.76%
Daily Std Dev39.39%40.28%
Max Drawdown-94.29%-76.14%
Current Drawdown-2.89%-11.25%

Fundamentals


CEU.TOBDT.TO
Market CapCA$2.06BCA$1.63B
EPSCA$0.83CA$1.51
PE Ratio10.9418.90
PEG Ratio3.622.55
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$2.30BCA$2.35B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$550.92MCA$196.13M
EBITDA (TTM)CA$249.67MCA$104.41M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CEU.TO and BDT.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CEU.TO achieves a 166.78% return, which is significantly higher than BDT.TO's 104.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CEU.TO has underperformed BDT.TO with an annualized return of 1.67%, while BDT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
31.02%
31.25%
CEU.TO
BDT.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) and Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CEU.TO, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.35
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CEU.TO, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CEU.TO, currently valued at 1.49, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.49
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CEU.TO, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CEU.TO, currently valued at 27.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0027.18
BDT.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDT.TO, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDT.TO, currently valued at 4.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDT.TO, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDT.TO, currently valued at 6.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.006.82
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDT.TO, currently valued at 20.29, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0020.29

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is comparable to the BDT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEU.TO and BDT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.003.004.005.006.007.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.35
3.40
CEU.TO
BDT.TO

Dividends

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than BDT.TO's 1.94% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CEU.TO
CES Energy Solutions Corp.
1.27%2.75%2.46%1.58%0.88%2.58%1.51%0.46%0.59%8.26%2.56%0.00%
BDT.TO
Bird Construction Inc.
1.94%3.20%4.80%3.97%4.88%5.45%6.38%3.85%8.38%5.84%6.84%5.79%

Drawdowns

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEU.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.29%, which is greater than BDT.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEU.TO and BDT.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-25.91%
-13.27%
CEU.TO
BDT.TO

Volatility

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Volatility Comparison

CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) at 13.74%. This indicates that CEU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.94%
13.74%
CEU.TO
BDT.TO

Financials

CEU.TO vs. BDT.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CES Energy Solutions Corp. and Bird Construction Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items