PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CES1.L vs. HSBA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CES1.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than HSBA.L's 20.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CES1.L has underperformed HSBA.L with an annualized return of 10.11%, while HSBA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.80% annualized return.


CES1.L

1D
0.11%
1M
2.95%
YTD
10.08%
6M
12.64%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
10.11%

HSBA.L

1D
-1.80%
1M
7.41%
YTD
20.29%
6M
31.42%
1Y
64.23%
3Y*
40.13%
5Y*
32.91%
10Y*
17.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CES1.L
iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.08%30.70%-4.07%11.92%-11.62%15.21%11.44%21.04%-16.15%28.53%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
20.29%57.78%34.72%32.14%19.91%22.90%-35.99%-2.42%-11.05%23.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CES1.L and HSBA.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.49

The correlation between CES1.L and HSBA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CES1.L
CES1.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CES1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CES1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CES1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CES1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CES1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBA.L
HSBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CES1.LHSBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

4.01

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

14.99

-8.44

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CES1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CES1.L and HSBA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CES1.LHSBA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.55

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.34

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.72

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.49

+0.18

Drawdowns

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CES1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum HSBA.L drawdown of -61.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CES1.L and HSBA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CES1.LHSBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-61.74%

+29.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-15.93%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-21.98%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.02%

-21.98%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-59.97%

+27.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-3.04%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-14.81%

+8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

4.27%

-1.16%

Volatility

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) is 4.07%, while HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that CES1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSBA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CES1.LHSBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

7.83%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

20.90%

-9.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.43%

25.10%

-11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

24.56%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

24.75%

-8.74%

Dividends

CES1.L vs. HSBA.L - Dividend Comparison

CES1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSBA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CES1.L
iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
4.11%4.29%7.16%6.80%4.11%3.54%0.00%6.79%5.83%5.18%5.79%6.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


CES1.L and HSBA.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CES1.L and HSBA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer