PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. UCIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CERY vs. UCIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CERY vs. UCIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 22.00% return, which is significantly higher than UCIB's 17.48% return.


CERY

1D
-1.16%
1M
5.37%
YTD
22.00%
6M
27.31%
1Y
31.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UCIB

1D
0.01%
1M
7.33%
YTD
17.48%
6M
21.42%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CERY vs. UCIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than UCIB's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. UCIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

UCIB
UCIB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UCIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCIB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
UCIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCIB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. UCIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CERYUCIBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.08

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

1.50

+1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.16

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

6.17

+4.71

CERY vs. UCIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the UCIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and UCIB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CERYUCIBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.08

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

0.40

+1.51

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and UCIB is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CERY vs. UCIB - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while UCIB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CERY vs. UCIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum UCIB drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and UCIB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYUCIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-36.94%

+26.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-11.17%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.86%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-9.11%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.91%

-0.98%

Volatility

CERY vs. UCIB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) at 5.11%. This indicates that CERY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CERYUCIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.11%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

15.71%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

22.28%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

24.02%

-9.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

21.62%

-6.97%