PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEQT.TO achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than PRA.TO's 24.59% return.


CEQT.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.17%
6M
11.24%
YTD
13.51%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
21.50%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.74%

PRA.TO

1D
-0.50%
1M
2.59%
6M
14.52%
YTD
24.59%
1Y
38.92%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
10.34%
ALL TIME*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$4.87KCA$10.66KCA$16.79K
CA$299.91KCA$380.88KCA$470.71K

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CEQT.TO
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF
13.51%18.84%27.38%6.47%
PRA.TO
Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund
24.59%18.21%8.78%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CEQT.TO and PRA.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2023

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CEQT.TO
CEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

PRA.TO
PRA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEQT.TOPRA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.52

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

6.15

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

20.11

-6.00

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the PRA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEQT.TO and PRA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum PRA.TO drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQT.TO and PRA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEQT.TOPRA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-34.17%

+20.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-6.13%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-13.47%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.57%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-7.56%

+6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.87%

-0.01%

Volatility

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) is 1.60%, while Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund (PRA.TO) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that CEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEQT.TOPRA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

2.87%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

8.95%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

12.64%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.93%

13.59%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.93%

14.45%

-1.52%

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEQT.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PRA.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEQT.TO vs. PRA.TO - Dividend Comparison

CEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than PRA.TO's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEQT.TO
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF
1.09%1.25%1.82%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRA.TO
Purpose Diversified Real Asset Fund
2.10%3.23%2.95%3.12%1.93%1.25%1.52%1.57%1.77%1.93%1.64%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEQT.TO and PRA.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for PRA.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CI and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CEQT.TO and 0.73% for PRA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEQT.TO and PRA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer