CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO
CEQP.TO (CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF) and FEQT.NEO (Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEQP.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FEQT.NEO.
Performance
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CEQP.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEQT.NEO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 10.77%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 7.21% |
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEQP.TO and FEQT.NEO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
CEQP.TO
FEQT.NEO
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO) and Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund (FEQT.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEQP.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 1.79 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEQP.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.33%, smaller than the maximum FEQT.NEO drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQP.TO and FEQT.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEQP.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.33% | -13.24% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.48% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -1.45% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEQP.TO | FEQT.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.40% | 11.02% | +5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 12.44% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 12.44% | +3.96% |
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEQP.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FEQT.NEO's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEQP.TO vs. FEQT.NEO - Dividend Comparison
CEQP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than FEQT.NEO's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEQT.NEO Fidelity All-in-One Equity ETF Fund | 0.82% | 0.91% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEQP.TO and FEQT.NEO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEQP.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEQP.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: CI and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CEQP.TO and 0.43% for FEQT.NEO.
Find the right allocation for CEQP.TO and FEQT.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer