CEPI vs. WTID
CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - CEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). CEPI is actively managed, while WTID is passively managed. Over the past year, CEPI returned 21.57% vs -73.65% for WTID. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTID.
Performance
CEPI vs. WTID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than WTID's -66.53% return.
CEPI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.94%
WTID
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -31.17%
- 6M
- -50.97%
- YTD
- -66.53%
- 1Y
- -73.65%
- 3Y*
- -45.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24M | $1.26M | $1.60M | |
| $222.39K | $205.27K | $617.68K |
CEPI vs. WTID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 18.92% | 10.75% | -7.02% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -66.53% | -44.50% | 26.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEPI and WTID is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | -0.06 |
The correlation between CEPI and WTID shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.11 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEPI vs. WTID — Risk / Return Rank
CEPI
WTID
CEPI vs. WTID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEPI | WTID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.77 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | -0.97 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.24 | -1.48 | +3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEPI vs. WTID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum WTID drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and WTID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEPI | WTID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -90.80% | +61.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | -76.06% | +53.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -86.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -90.14% | +85.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -56.00% | +47.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.65% | 49.84% | -40.19% |
Volatility
CEPI vs. WTID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) is 11.17%, while MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a volatility of 23.61%. This indicates that CEPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEPI | WTID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 23.61% | -12.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.73% | 56.22% | -32.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.34% | 69.07% | -39.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 70.58% | -38.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.88% | 70.58% | -38.70% |
CEPI vs. WTID - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than WTID's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEPI vs. WTID - Dividend Comparison
CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.15%, while WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 44.15% | 50.78% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEPI and WTID have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (23.61%) compared to CEPI (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs WTID's -90.80%.
On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 21.57% vs -73.65% for WTID. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, CEPI has been the lower-risk option at 11.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 21.57% return vs -73.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTID.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 44.15%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
CEPI is categorized as Derivative Income, while WTID is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.95% for WTID.
CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEPI and WTID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer