CEPI vs. BFOC
CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - CEPI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by REX, while BFOC is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFOC.
Performance
CEPI vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than BFOC's -7.39% return.
CEPI
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 34.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -7.39%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEPI vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 20.71% | -8.92% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.39% | -9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEPI and BFOC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEPI vs. BFOC — Risk / Return Rank
CEPI
BFOC
CEPI vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEPI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEPI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -1.88 | +2.33 |
Drawdowns
CEPI vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, which is greater than BFOC's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEPI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.48% | -18.20% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -18.20% | +16.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -12.52% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | — | — |
Volatility
CEPI vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEPI | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.79% | 12.61% | +14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 12.61% | +18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.57% | 12.61% | +18.96% |
CEPI vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEPI vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.71%, while BFOC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF | 42.71% | 50.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEPI and BFOC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFOC.
CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 42.71%, compared with 0.00% for BFOC.
CEPI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: REX and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.90% for BFOC.
Find the right allocation for CEPI and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer