CEPI vs. BFAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CEPI (REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF) and BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CEPI returned 32.91% vs -25.68% for BFAP. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEPI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFAP.

Performance

CEPI vs. BFAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 22.16% return, which is significantly higher than BFAP's -22.18% return.

CEPI

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 22.16%
• 6M: 19.60%
• 1Y: 32.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFAP

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -7.11%
• YTD: -22.18%
• 6M: -22.50%
• 1Y: -25.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEPI vs. BFAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	22.16%	28.52%
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-22.18%	8.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CEPI and BFAP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.67

The correlation between CEPI and BFAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEPI vs. BFAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEPI

CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 32
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEPI vs. BFAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEPI	BFAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	-1.20	+2.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	-1.66	+3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.80	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	-0.77	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.49	-1.40	+4.89

CEPI vs. BFAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the BFAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEPI and BFAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEPI vs. BFAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, smaller than the maximum BFAP drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and BFAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEPI	BFAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.48%	-33.31%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.47%	-33.31%	+10.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-32.37%	+30.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-11.64%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.45%	18.39%	-8.94%

Volatility

CEPI vs. BFAP - Volatility Comparison

REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) at 5.22%. This indicates that CEPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEPI	BFAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	5.22%	+2.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.59%	16.92%	+4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.39%	21.43%	+5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.62%	20.47%	+11.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.62%	20.47%	+11.15%

CEPI vs. BFAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BFAP's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEPI vs. BFAP - Dividend Comparison

CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.52%, more than BFAP's 24.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.38%	18.97%
CEPI REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF	44.52%	50.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEPI and BFAP in my portfolio?

CEPI and BFAP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEPI or BFAP?

CEPI has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to BFAP (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs BFAP's -33.31%.

Which ETF is better, CEPI or BFAP?

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 32.91% vs -25.68% for BFAP. On fees, CEPI is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CEPI or BFAP?

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 32.91% return vs -25.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CEPI or BFAP?

CEPI is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CEPI or BFAP?

CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 44.52%, compared with 24.38% for BFAP.

What is the main difference between CEPI and BFAP?

They also come from different issuers: REX and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.90% for BFAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.