PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) and SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, CEMT.DE has underperformed ZPRW.DE with an annualized return of 6.44%, while ZPRW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.


CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.44%

ZPRW.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
3.83%
YTD
11.85%
6M
15.32%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%17.53%5.08%14.19%-18.24%19.63%1.61%28.81%-13.99%13.62%
ZPRW.DE
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.85%35.70%8.86%13.72%-4.74%27.39%-7.65%23.73%-14.98%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMT.DE and ZPRW.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between CEMT.DE and ZPRW.DE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRW.DE
ZPRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) and SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEMT.DEZPRW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.33

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

12.39

-8.36

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMT.DE and ZPRW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMT.DEZPRW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.28

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.93

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.61

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.45

-0.08

Drawdowns

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPRW.DE drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMT.DE and ZPRW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMT.DEZPRW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.66%

-39.54%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.26%

-9.27%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.36%

-17.04%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.23%

-18.41%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

-39.54%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.75%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-6.92%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

2.50%

-1.34%

Volatility

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) is 0.00%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that CEMT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMT.DEZPRW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.40%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

10.84%

-10.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

13.53%

-7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

14.89%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.54%

-1.43%

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPRW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEMT.DE vs. ZPRW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEMT.DE nor ZPRW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMT.DE and ZPRW.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted, while ZPRW.DE tracks MSCI Europe Value Exposure Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMT.DE and 0.20% for ZPRW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMT.DE and ZPRW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer