PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) and Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Europe Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EABE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRW.DE achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than EABE.DE's 6.30% return.


ZPRW.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
3.83%
YTD
11.85%
6M
15.32%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
10.74%

EABE.DE

1D
0.58%
1M
3.02%
YTD
6.30%
6M
8.68%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZPRW.DE
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.85%35.70%11.33%
EABE.DE
Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Europe Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
6.30%14.64%6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRW.DE and EABE.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2024

0.82

The correlation between ZPRW.DE and EABE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRW.DE
ZPRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EABE.DE
EABE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EABE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EABE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EABE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EABE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EABE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) and Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Europe Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EABE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRW.DEEABE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.17

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.14

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

3.88

+8.51

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the EABE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRW.DE and EABE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRW.DEEABE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.88

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, which is greater than EABE.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRW.DE and EABE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRW.DEEABE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-15.99%

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-10.45%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-1.64%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-2.28%

-4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.04%

-0.54%

Volatility

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) and Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Europe Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EABE.DE) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRW.DEEABE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.52%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

11.18%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

13.64%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

13.91%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

13.91%

+3.63%

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EABE.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPRW.DE vs. EABE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPRW.DE nor EABE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRW.DE and EABE.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EABE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EABE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ZPRW.DE.

ZPRW.DE tracks MSCI Europe Value Exposure Select, while EABE.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ZPRW.DE and 0.18% for EABE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRW.DE and EABE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer