CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE
CEMQ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF) and SXRL.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMQ.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality, while SXRL.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMQ.DE returned 8.78%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SXRL.DE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SXRL.DE.
Performance
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CEMQ.DE is traded in EUR, while SXRL.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXRL.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMQ.DE achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than SXRL.DE's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMQ.DE has outperformed SXRL.DE with an annualized return of 8.78%, while SXRL.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.00% annualized return.
CEMQ.DE
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 6.82%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
SXRL.DE
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 3.36%
- 3Y*
- 1.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.00%
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMQ.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF | 6.82% | 10.19% | 3.69% | 14.57% | -11.90% | 26.61% | 1.06% | 32.46% | -7.32% | 10.41% |
SXRL.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.23% | -4.83% | 8.08% | 1.19% | -4.08% | 6.08% | -2.60% | 8.44% | 5.99% | -11.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMQ.DE and SXRL.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015 | 0.01 |
The correlation between CEMQ.DE and SXRL.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (5 years) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMQ.DE
SXRL.DE
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEMQ.DE | SXRL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 0.75 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.44 | 2.06 | +1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than SXRL.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMQ.DE and SXRL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMQ.DE | SXRL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -17.10% | -16.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -4.47% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.96% | -10.18% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.65% | -12.16% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.76% | -17.10% | -16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -6.09% | +6.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -6.69% | +1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 1.63% | +1.07% |
Volatility
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) at 0.97%. This indicates that CEMQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXRL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMQ.DE | SXRL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 0.97% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 4.29% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 5.79% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 7.84% | +6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 7.59% | +7.43% |
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRL.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMQ.DE vs. SXRL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMQ.DE nor SXRL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMQ.DE and SXRL.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRL.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRL.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMQ.DE.
CEMQ.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while SXRL.DE is Government Bonds. CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality, while SXRL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMQ.DE and 0.07% for SXRL.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMQ.DE and SXRL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer