SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L).
SXRL.DE and FLOA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXRL.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year. It was launched on Jun 3, 2009. FLOA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. Both SXRL.DE and FLOA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXRL.DE or FLOA.L.
Correlation
The correlation between SXRL.DE and FLOA.L is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SXRL.DE:
0.99
FLOA.L:
4.66
SXRL.DE:
1.47
FLOA.L:
7.60
SXRL.DE:
1.18
FLOA.L:
2.29
SXRL.DE:
0.38
FLOA.L:
8.40
SXRL.DE:
2.38
FLOA.L:
88.93
SXRL.DE:
1.63%
FLOA.L:
0.07%
SXRL.DE:
3.94%
FLOA.L:
1.29%
SXRL.DE:
-14.03%
FLOA.L:
-14.96%
SXRL.DE:
-5.67%
FLOA.L:
-0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXRL.DE achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 0.73% return.
SXRL.DE
0.66%
0.37%
-0.97%
3.59%
-0.13%
N/A
FLOA.L
0.73%
0.41%
2.75%
6.05%
3.15%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRL.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SXRL.DE
FLOA.L
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXRL.DE nor FLOA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRL.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum FLOA.L drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRL.DE and FLOA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXRL.DE vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.81% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) at 0.40%. This indicates that SXRL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.