PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMQ.DE achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than IEVL.L's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMQ.DE has underperformed IEVL.L with an annualized return of 7.82%, while IEVL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.70% annualized return.


CEMQ.DE

1D
0.82%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.95%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.82%

IEVL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
2.62%
YTD
13.95%
6M
17.02%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMQ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF
4.17%10.17%3.72%14.50%-11.87%26.64%1.09%32.48%-7.31%10.34%
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating
13.95%35.00%10.59%13.55%-3.79%26.68%-8.75%21.75%-13.48%10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015

0.80

The correlation between CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMQ.DE
CEMQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEMQ.DEIEVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.34

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

12.45

-10.32

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMQ.DEIEVL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.38

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.94

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.61

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Drawdowns

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.74%, smaller than the maximum IEVL.L drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMQ.DEIEVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.74%

-40.09%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-9.78%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-17.49%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.69%

-19.55%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

-40.09%

+6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-0.78%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-7.51%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.63%

+0.54%

Volatility

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) is 3.97%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that CEMQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMQ.DEIEVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.86%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

10.95%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

13.70%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.02%

15.36%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

17.66%

-2.64%

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEMQ.DE vs. IEVL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEMQ.DE nor IEVL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality, while IEVL.L tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMQ.DE and IEVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer