CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
CEMQ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF) and H4ZA.DE (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR) are both Europe Equities funds - CEMQ.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality while H4ZA.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMQ.DE returned 7.82%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for H4ZA.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEMQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for H4ZA.DE.
Performance
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMQ.DE achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZA.DE's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMQ.DE has underperformed H4ZA.DE with an annualized return of 7.82%, while H4ZA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.
CEMQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 6.60%
- 3Y*
- 7.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
H4ZA.DE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMQ.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF | 4.17% | 10.17% | 3.72% | 14.50% | -11.87% | 26.64% | 1.09% | 32.48% | -7.31% | 10.34% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 7.24% | 22.26% | 13.81% | 22.59% | -8.87% | 23.72% | -2.73% | 30.07% | -11.96% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMQ.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between CEMQ.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMQ.DE
H4ZA.DE
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMQ.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.43 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 4.85 | -2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMQ.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.98 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.69 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.41 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.74%, smaller than the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMQ.DE and H4ZA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMQ.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.74% | -38.41% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -10.97% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.90% | -16.40% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.69% | -23.26% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.74% | -38.41% | +4.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -0.50% | -2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -7.84% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.24% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) is 3.97%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that CEMQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMQ.DE | H4ZA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 4.95% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 12.99% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 15.99% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 17.50% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 18.17% | -3.15% |
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMQ.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEMQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMQ.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 2.44% | 2.49% | 5.35% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.84% | 3.55% | 2.73% | 2.85% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMQ.DE and H4ZA.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMQ.DE.
CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMQ.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMQ.DE and H4ZA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer