CEMFX vs. LZEMX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CEMFX (Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund) and LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, CEMFX returned 10.54%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for LZEMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CEMFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LZEMX.

Performance

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMFX achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 25.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEMFX having a 10.54% annualized return and LZEMX not far behind at 10.36%.

CEMFX

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 16.08%
• YTD: 21.22%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: 10.54%

LZEMX

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: 20.02%
• YTD: 25.19%
• 1Y: 45.59%
• 3Y*: 27.37%
• 5Y*: 14.05%
• 10Y*: 10.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund	21.22%	31.39%	9.51%	26.45%	-16.15%	6.74%	8.70%	19.75%	-16.90%	29.82%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	25.19%	41.35%	7.60%	22.44%	-14.86%	5.37%	-0.07%	18.06%	-18.11%	28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMFX and LZEMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.83

The correlation between CEMFX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CEMFX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMFX

CEMFX Risk / Return Rank: 82
CEMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CEMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CEMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CEMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CEMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEMFX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	3.14	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	4.04	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.57	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	4.33	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	14.98	-4.37

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMFX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMFX and LZEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEMFX	LZEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.30%	-60.08%	+20.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-10.42%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.27%	-14.27%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.73%	-29.13%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.30%	-44.08%	+4.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.02%	-1.40%	-4.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-16.58%	+7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	3.01%	+0.83%

Volatility

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 5.41%. This indicates that CEMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEMFX	LZEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.16%	5.41%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.87%	12.43%	+2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	14.37%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.79%	14.52%	+0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.18%	16.33%	-1.15%

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEMFX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

CEMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than LZEMX's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund	2.07%	1.72%	3.31%	4.68%	1.26%	2.62%	2.13%	4.16%	2.26%	3.59%	3.65%	4.60%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.64%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEMFX and LZEMX in my portfolio?

CEMFX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEMFX or LZEMX?

CEMFX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to LZEMX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEMFX dropped -39.30% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.