PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPPX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPPX.DE's 1.45% return.


CEMF.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
0.27%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPPX.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.73%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.18%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
-2.61%
5Y*
-4.66%
10Y*
-1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEMF.DE and SPPX.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMF.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPPX.DE
SPPX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPPX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (SPPX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEMF.DESPPX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, smaller than the maximum SPPX.DE drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and SPPX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMF.DESPPX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-44.59%

+40.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-40.51%

+37.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-22.62%

+21.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

Volatility

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMF.DESPPX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

8.87%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

14.26%

-9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

16.57%

-11.94%

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPX.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEMF.DE vs. SPPX.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPPX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPPX.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.58%4.77%4.08%3.14%2.57%1.63%2.07%2.42%2.38%2.77%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMF.DE and SPPX.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPPX.DE.

CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index, while SPPX.DE tracks Bloomberg US 10+ Year Treasury Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CEMF.DE and 0.15% for SPPX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMF.DE and SPPX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer