PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than EXVM.DE's 0.83% return.


CEMF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.05%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-1.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EXVM.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.14%
6M
0.84%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
1.66%
3Y*
2.58%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*
0.30%
ALL TIME*
0.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEMF.DE and EXVM.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMF.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


EXVM.DE
EXVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EXVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE) (EXVM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CEMF.DEEXVM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.86

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, smaller than the maximum EXVM.DE drawdown of -6.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and EXVM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMF.DEEXVM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-6.33%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-0.01%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-1.75%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

Volatility

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEMF.DEEXVM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

0.53%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

0.51%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

0.79%

+3.71%

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EXVM.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CEMF.DE vs. EXVM.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXVM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXVM.DE
iShares eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1yr UCITS ETF (DE)
1.06%1.14%0.77%0.80%0.61%0.78%0.96%1.10%1.05%1.15%1.51%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEMF.DE and EXVM.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMF.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMF.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for EXVM.DE.

CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index, while EXVM.DE tracks eb.rexx Government Germany 0-1 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CEMF.DE and 0.13% for EXVM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEMF.DE and EXVM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer