CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE
CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) and EUN6.DE (iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds from iShares - CEMF.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index while EUN6.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Short Treasury (0-12 Month) Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEMF.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for EUN6.DE.
Performance
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMF.DE achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than EUN6.DE's 0.08% return.
CEMF.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EUN6.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 0.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.43%
- 10Y*
- 0.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.26%
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | -1.56% | 1.70% |
EUN6.DE iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.08% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMF.DE and EUN6.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMF.DE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EUN6.DE
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE) and iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEMF.DE | EUN6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMF.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.45%, smaller than the maximum EUN6.DE drawdown of -4.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMF.DE and EUN6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMF.DE | EUN6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -4.94% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -0.05% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -1.32% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.44% | — |
Volatility
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMF.DE | EUN6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50% | 1.17% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 0.80% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 0.70% | +3.80% |
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMF.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EUN6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMF.DE vs. EUN6.DE - Dividend Comparison
CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUN6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CEMF.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUN6.DE iShares € Govt Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 0.96% | 2.79% | 2.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMF.DE and EUN6.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUN6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUN6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CEMF.DE.
CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index, while EUN6.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Short Treasury (0-12 Month) Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CEMF.DE and 0.07% for EUN6.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMF.DE and EUN6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer