CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE).

CEMC.DE and NQSE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMC.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2025. NQSE.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both CEMC.DE and NQSE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CEMC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)	-0.71%	2.22%
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	-6.05%	11.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMC.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's -6.05% return.

CEMC.DE

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: -0.71%
• 6M: -0.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NQSE.DE

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -3.23%
• YTD: -6.05%
• 6M: -3.39%
• 1Y: 21.83%
• 3Y*: 20.63%
• 5Y*: 10.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMC.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.

NQSE.DE

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

CEMC.DE

iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)

Return for Risk

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQSE.DE

NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEMC.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.67	-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CEMC.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEMC.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CEMC.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMC.DE and NQSE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEMC.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-37.67%	+32.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-8.45%	+4.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-8.72%	+7.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CEMC.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.80%	19.95%	-12.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.80%	20.89%	-13.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.80%	21.60%	-13.80%