CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE).
CEMC.DE and QDVE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMC.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2025. QDVE.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both CEMC.DE and QDVE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEMC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.71% | 2.22% |
QDVE.DE iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | -7.62% | 16.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMC.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than QDVE.DE's -7.62% return.
CEMC.DE
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVE.DE
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -7.62%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 18.14%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMC.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMC.DE
QDVE.DE
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.93 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMC.DE and QDVE.DE is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMC.DE nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum QDVE.DE drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMC.DE and QDVE.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -31.45% | +26.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -12.90% | +9.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -5.86% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.73% | — |
Volatility
CEMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 25.04% | -17.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.80% | 22.52% | -14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.80% | 21.66% | -13.86% |